Thursday, May 13, 2010

Law and Development Review: India and Brazil Special Issue

A Special Issue of the Law and Development Review has some interesting pieces on the emerging powers, namely India and Brazil. In particular, there are pieces on Indian intellectual property and WTO law that may be of interest to our readers (marked in bold). And an excellent piece on Indian competition law by Shiju Varghese.

The special issue also boasts an introduction from leading scholars, BS Chimni and David Trubek. And has been edited by another academic stalwart, Prof YS Lee.

Special Issue (2010): New Voices from Emerging Powers - Brazil and India

Introduction
By: Bhupinder Chimni and David Trubek

Linking Promises to Policies: Law and Development in an Unequal Brazil
By: Diogo R. Coutinho

The Persistence of Formalism: Towards a Situated Critique beyond the Classic Separation of Powers
By: Jose R. Rodriguez

Development Bank, Law and Innovation Financing in a New Brazilian Economy
By: Mario Schapiro

John Rawls' Justice as Fairness and the WTO: A Critical Analysis on the Initial Position of the Multilateral Agricultural Negotiation
By: Rafael Rosa Cedro and Bruno Furtado Vieira

Turning Trips on Its Head: An "IP Cross Retaliation" Model for Developing Countries
By: Shamnad Basheer


Exceptions and Limitations in Indian Copyright Law for Education: An Assessment
By: Lawrence Liang

The Indian Competition Act: A Historical and Developmental Perspective

By: Shiju Varghese Mazhuvanchery

Product Patents and Access to Medicines in India: A Critical Review of the Implementation of TRIPS Patent Regime

By: Gopakumar K. M.

Transit and Trade Barriers in South Asia: Multilateral Obligations and Development Perspective
By: Prabir De

Stock Market and Shareholder Protection: Are They Important for Economic Growth?
By: Francis Xavier Rathinam and A. V. Raja

3 comments:

mnbvcxzaq1 said...

hi shamnad,
just read in today's newspaper (toi) about the joint action taken by india n brazil regarding the drug seizures (border/customs/transit) issue against the eu/netherland at wto. a move that shud ve been made earlier.
-aditya kant

Shamnad Basheer said...

You're absolutely right Aditya. This is a good move and will put some pressure on teh EU. However, as I've indicated earlier, I'm not so certain about the prospects of winning, given that we have taken on the EU directly (as opposed to individual member countries that did the actual seizures). My bet is that this would be settled soon and we will not end up with a panel decision.

mnbvcxzaq1 said...

honestly, i ve not yet examined the issue from that angle. tho i remember your earlier post (about an year ago, i guess) in favour of taking on with the individual countries first. logically, your proposition appears to be a better route.
-aditya kant