Biotechnology is an
extremely fast-moving field in which new products and services
are developed from an increasingly complex and cumulative set of
underlying technologies. Latest treatments to diseases come from biotechnology
where sequencing genes, identifying individual gene functions and
mutations, creating systems to selectively express, regulate or silence
genes, predict protein structures and expressions, mapping the influence
of genetic make-up on metabolism and / or otherwise analyzing vast amounts
of genetic data. These many technologies contribute to the rapid pace
of advancement in the life sciences and offer tremendous promise for
improving human health and furthering economic development.
Organizations investing in research and development (R&D) in the
field of biotechnology regularly file patents.
In general, biotechnology
inventions require description by reference to the sequence of a gene or
protein. A gene includes a polynucleotide chain, where each nucleotide is
selected from an "A," "G," C," or "T."
A protein includes a chain of amino acids. Each amino acid is given
a unique one letter code, and there are twenty common and naturally occurring
amino acids. A sequence listing will identify the gene or protein by a
"SEQ ID NO." (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 1), and provide the entire sequence.
One gene or protein may range from several hundred to over a thousand characters.
A single gene or protein sequence usually would not be an issue since the
entire sequence could be presented in a manageable and affordable number of
pages. In rare but not unheard of applications, many sequences-perhaps
thousands-are disclosed. In these applications the number of pages becomes
very large.
The purpose of this post
is to compare the cost of filing a possible gene sequence patent application
from biotechnology field, in different countries and see the
resulting application trend in India. There is one clear inference
from the data: In India, the cost of filing a gene sequence patent
application is extremely expensive as compared to other jurisdictions.
Hat-tip: My ex-colleague and mentor, Douglas
Bucklin.
This particular issue may
result in the provision being challenged in litigation. It would not be
an open and shut case, but it is extremely likely that there are adequate
grounds to put a serious dent in the provision. In India
applications including sequence listings are allowed.
The specific provision is: In case the Application for Patent
discloses sequence listing of nucleotides and/or amino acids, the same
shall be filed in electronic form. However,
the fee with respect to the equivalent number of pages shall be payable.
It is interesting to note here the fee
structure adopted by our patent office. For an entity other than natural
person, the fee for each sheet of specification in addition to 30 (sheets)
is Rs.400 per sheet. Note that electronic filing is allowed but the
fee with respect to equivalent number of pages is required. That is there is no benefit to file electronically.
It is here that significant
differences arise. These differences are in terms of the fee paid for
filing. Some countries make the fee affordable or some waive the
additional fee altogether. For example, the U.S., the EPO (see also fee
tables here), Japan, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Mexico allow for free or low
cost filings of large sequence listings.
The forums where the fee is reduced,
or where there is no additional fee for filing sequences, require electronic
filing. In PCT applications, standard practice for writing specifications
includes writing important sequences into the text of the application if
possible. Such a step guarantees that the sequence is part of the
application even if the electronically filed sequence listing is separated from
the paper filing in a patent office. But in the case of very large
sequence listings, this is not possible since the number of pages would be
excessive. In some places, the sequence listing is still filed on paper
but is not counted against the page limit. In these forums, printing fees
for the sequence listing may apply
It is interesting to note that India
has no provision to reduce the fees associated with large sequence listings.
The number of pages of the entire application, including the sequence
listing, is taken into consideration when calculating the filing fee. For
example, an application with 45 pages of specification, five pages of claims,
one abstract page, and 6024 pages of sequence listing would be counted as a
6075 page application. This is unlike the U.S., the EPO, Japan, Mexico,
Canada, Brazil, or Australia where the application size would be counted as 51
pages.
One recent estimate on an application
of roughly this size showed that the filing fees would be over $50,000 (US).
In contrast, a U.S. non-provisional application of the same size where
the sequence listing was electronically filed would cost $625.
China also has higher fees with a
large sequence listing, but the fees are capped. The fees for an
electronically filed sequence listing are calculated as if the application were
filed on paper, but the fees are capped at the amount charged for a 400 page
application.
Conclusion: This is the
reason that the requirement for sequence listing applications to pay fees
according to the total number of pages at our IPO may be challenged.
The argument is two fold - (1) there
is no nexus between the large fees and filing electronically, (2) There is no nexus for examination and printing of the sequence because the comparison (between sequences) is done by computer, and not by
humans; and (3) India is
not complying with the WTO requirements by creating a barrier for filing patent
applications containing large sequence listings.

2 comments:
Hi Rajiv,
Good that you brought this up on Spicyip. Have been trying to invite attention to this issue at various other platforms including the Indian Patent Office. While there is common consensus on the fact that a) there should be no requirement of filing the sequence listing in hard copy as there can only be a machine to machine comparison for novelty assessment and b) regardless of this requirement, fees for pages should not be payable.
In keeping with WTO, the Act does not require an applicant to file sequences in a hard copy but only in a .txt format which is a standardized format of the WIPO. See http://www.wipo.int/standards/en/pdf/03-25-01.pdf
Payment of fees for additional pages definitely places a huge burden on applicants intending to file biotech related inventions in India, moreso when sequence listing pages might run into thousands of pages.
This issue was also highlighted in a couple of meetings with the CG as well as the officials of the IPO and we were told that this matter is sub-judice. I however, have no idea about this.
One more thing, there is no way one can assess the number of pages in the listing unless one takes a print out of the same. For a person who is using the e-filing and in view of the recent circular where the CG has notified that all the documents shall be taken from the WIPO website, how is one supposed to calculate fees for the sequence listing pages and why should one do that?
On a lighter note, i hope that the environment minister takes note of this and requests the DIPP to stop asking for hard copies and consequently, the fees for such pages. So much for a paperless office!!
Sequence listing should be filed in electronic form because it is required under rule 9(1). There is no requirement for filing the hard copy. But fees for corresponding number of pages have to be filed.
Post a Comment